ANALISIS HUKUM PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN PIMPINAN KPK DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 112/PUU-XX/2022
Keywords:
Term of Office, Chairman of the Anti-Corruption Commission, Constitutional Court DecisionAbstract
The regulation of the term of office of the head of a state agency in the law is an open legal policy which becomes the authority of the legislature to determine it. The extension of the term of the leadership of the KPK in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 112/PUU-XX/2022 is a misconception because the MK has changed the provisions that should be the authority of legislation to regulate, it. The extension of the term of office of the CPC chief in the judgment has legal effects on both the KPK institution itself and other independent agencies. One of them, this MK decision can be a gap in the application for an extension of the term of office of the head of other independent state agencies in later days, to submit the same application, due to the inequality of time of the office of head of the commission or state agency.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Resma Bintani Gustaliza, Tasyah Roma Arta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.